> > Yes, of course I have tons of evidence. You just study the Vedic > scriptures in India. All the evidence is there. It's a different way of > acquiring knowledge. It is all written in the books, you just have to > accept it, that's all. And it's perfect, it's not subject to revisions and > changes... One example is light. Science in the past considered light to > be waves, but now science considers light to be photons, but the Vedic > scriptures have always described light as "tiny shining particles", or > photons. So in the past, before science knew light was photons, they would > have ridiculed the Vedic version but now it is proven the Vedic version is > correct. Everything else is also there and many things have been confirmed > by science and gradually all the knowledge in the Vedas will be verified > by science. But it is the hard way. It takes so long... You could just > read the books... > >You are wrong. Photons are not particles. They are something which >does has "particle-aspects", but just as much have >"wave-aspects". Quantum theory connects the two. Many easily >observable properties of light are NOT consistent with the particle >view. Light is particles... Why can't particles form waves? What could be the argument? How are eaisly observable properties of light not explainable by this method?