Universe in ‘Endless Cycle’
Get your head around this: the Universe had no beginning and it will have no end. Two scientists have put forward a new model to explain how the cosmos is and where it might be going.
They have put forward their views in the journal Science.
Star surprise
The current model of the Universe starts with a Big Bang, a mighty explosion of space, matter and time about 14 billion years ago.
What we’re proposing in this new picture is that the Big Bang is not a beginning of time but really just the latest in an infinite series of cycles
|
|
Paul Steinhardt
|
This model accounts for several important features we see in the Universe – such as why everything looks the same in all directions and the fact that the cosmos appears “flat” (parallel lines would never meet however long).But the model has several shortcomings, Steinhardt and Turok say.
buy neurontin
It cannot tell us what happened before the Big Bang or explain the eventual fate of the Universe. Will it expand forever or stop and contract?
Problems with these futures became apparent in 1998, when studies of distant, exploding stars showed the Universe was expanding at an accelerating rate. It was a big surprise for some astronomers who thought everything might eventually come back together in a “Big Crunch”.
Empty and flat
The apparent acceleration has since been checked and shown to be real.
It led cosmologists to revive an old idea that some “dark energy” is at work in the cosmos, pushing everything apart.
Steinhardt and Turok put this energy – a scalar field as they mathematically describe it – right at the centre of their new model.
They think the dark energy drives a cycle of activity that includes a big bang and a subsequent period of expansion that leaves the Universe smooth, empty and flat.
buy flexeril
“The scalar field changes its character over time,” Paul Steinhardt told the BBC. “Finally, the field begins to build up energy to a point where it suddenly becomes unstable and bursts into matter and radiation, filling the Universe, and driving the next period of expansion.”
‘Hardest science’
He added: “In the standard picture, it’s presumed that the Big Bang is actually a beginning of space and time; that there was nothingness, and then suddenly out of nothingness there sprang space, time, matter, radiation, etcetera.
|
The history of cosmology is the history of us being completely wrong
|
|
Cosmology writer Marcus Chown
|
“What we’re proposing in this new picture is that the Big Bang is not a beginning of time but really just the latest in an infinite series of cycles, in which the Universe has gone through periods of heating, expanding, cooling, stagnating, emptying, and then re-expanding again.”Steinhardt and Turok have discussed their ideas with peers and have received a positive, but “cautious”, response. “The ultimate arbiter will be Nature,” they write in the journal Science.
buy antabuse
“Measurements of gravitational waves and the properties of dark energy can provide decisive ways to discriminate between the two pictures observationally.”
Cosmology writer Marcus Chown concedes it will be extremely difficult to finally prove any model of the Universe.
“The history of cosmology is the history of us being completely wrong,” he told the BBC. “I mean, cosmology is the hardest of all sciences; we sit on this tiny planet in the middle of this vast Universe, we can’t go anywhere and do any experiments – all we can do is pick up the light that happens to fall on us and deduce some things about the Universe.”
Paul Steinhardt is at Princeton University, US, and Neil Turok is at Cambridge University, UK.
About the Author
Related Posts
Teachings of Lord Caitanya 1968-72 to Present Comparison →
Book Changes: A Dangerous Precedent →
BBT Vs. Hansadutta Court Case Singapore 1992-1996 →
Saying that everything came from ‘nothing’ is a simply another attempt to deny the existence of God. This means the scientists are ready to accept anything and even this ‘nothing’ but not the existence and supremacy of God.
The universe will come back together but not in a Big Crunch. Rather, it will wrap around in a sort of mushroom fashion because nothing goes strait outward in space since space-time warps space into a curvature and ergo does not allow for any straight lines on the grand scale. They all eventually curve/bend to produce this wrap-around fate. That is what produces the bang/collapse repetition, perhaps an infinite number of those cycles after one initial beginning. I’m the author of Space Ark!, a story featuring that series of cycles.
You can not speculate what the universe will do. That is rubbish. We know what the universe will do because we have heard it from the creator of the universe. And it is expanding at the moment and it is almost at the point where it will stop expanding and start contracting. And the whole universe will be compressed down to the size of a small seed and that will again enter within the body of Maha Visnu and all living entities and all matter will be put into suspended animation until the time of the next creation when that seed like universe will again come out of the body of Maha-Visnu and expand again. It is an endless cycle.
Is there a connection between what people percieve, what we learn, we see, our intelligence and the fact that space is expanding…. technology, such as the hubble telescope has seen further than ever before, this technology is brought about by human thought and its effect was to discover a more vast universe than ever before, expanding further than the telescopes capabilities. What if thought is the key to why the universe is here and expanding, we are becoming more intelligent and so the universe expands. Perhaps it is not a matter of scientific explanation but the mere side-product of our evolving intelligence. Perhaps there is no end to its scale, and its beginning was intelligence.
Perhaps we could find all these answers by reading Srila Prabhupada’s books which contain the words of the Creator Himself.