Published on February 17th, 2024 | by

Apollo Zero –The Apollo Moon Landings are Science Fiction

Apollo Zero seeks to prove that no man has ever really walked on the moon.

Think about this: to date, only three countries have been able to put a man merely in Earth orbit – the United States, Russia, and China. That speaks to how difficult it is just to get into orbit. Next, consider how far away the moon is from the Earth: 240,000 miles. Since the alleged moon landings, no country even claims to have gone more than 400 miles from Earth and that was in the Space Shuttle. The International Space Station orbits at 200 miles above Earth. There is a big difference between 240,000 miles and 400 miles. Why can’t anyone make it more than 400 miles from Earth today if we could make a 480,000 mile round trip in 1969?

NASA further asserts that three men were loaded into a rocket, flew 240,000 miles to the moon and then achieved lunar orbit. They say the spacecraft separated and two astronauts flew 60 miles to the surface of the moon, in a vacuum and 1/6 Earth gravity. They then hung out on the moon for up to three days in 250 degree heat, hit golf balls, rode a moon buggy — but what powered their life support and equipment? They say BATTERIES.

They then supposedly blasted off the surface of the moon, docked with the third man going around the moon at over 4000 miles per hour, and made it 240,000 miles back to Earth. They re-entered Earth’s atmosphere going 25,000 mph, but parachutes assured a safe landing in the ocean.

We hope you will agree that Apollo Zero proves the absurdity of NASA’s claim in a clear and convincing fashion. View Apollo Zero and decide for yourself.

 

Tags:


About the Author



24 Responses to Apollo Zero –The Apollo Moon Landings are Science Fiction

  1. Brian S says:

    Much of what societies pursue is based on perceived need. It’s not that various countries’ space programs can’t go beyond 400 miles in manned space flight. It’s that there is no need right now. The democratic U.S. went to the moon to prove its superiority over the communist USSR and to show the capability of its ICBMs. We can argue all day about the right and wrong of these reasons. Man will go beyond the 400 miles as countries focus on future Mars manned space flights. PS: using the term flew is misleading. The lunar lander mostly fell with a minimum of flying.

    • Rubbish Brian. If man could go more than 400 miles above the earth man would go more than 400 miles above the earth. You don’t understand human nature at all. I am sure you don’t believe this. Elon Musk is talking about going to Mars, but no man has been more than 400 miles above earth, none of his rockets have taken people more than about 100 miles above earth, and he is going to Mars??????

    • Stephen says:

      Okay flew, fell doesnt matter…u have to go the facts their bud.
      No need to go to the moon? We have been trying to go for last 3 decades. All presidents in the past 30 years are on record, teasing us, saying we are going to go back, we want to go back…and decades pass. Because there is no need to go? Lol Then why tell us we are going over and over? It’s called “delaying the inevitable” like a fraud company like, Theranos, would do. Its on the record dude… The apollo missions are a certain total fraud/fake/scam/joke/failure. To say we have no need to go, contradicts the narrative of what they have been on record saying all along. If they could do it and say they’re going to do it for decades, why wouldn’t they have sent someone? Haha MY Goodness…I cant believe, after all these years, this is what the crooks of NASA have been even using as their refuting evidence haha. Oh, the other one…”it would be harder to fake it than to actually go at the time”….ahahaha…that statement is just dumb…oh, how about… “too many people involved to keep secret”….haha that doesn’t prove crap and can be easily explained away…moon rocks??? You can get tons of those on earth and they did.
      With all the important data destroyed, the only way to prove they went is to go now….but we will not be able to send a human past, even 900 miles of earth orbit…in our lifetimes and our children’s etc. because of the radiation. They know it and feel so dumb right now and have been feeling stupid for past 20 years with the internet…thats why Google etc censors space narratives that don’t fit their agenda. Sooo fake…the evidence is so overwhelming that we didn’t go that you don’t even have to have all the facts to mop the floor with NASA and hear them try explain away their fraud…you could be a total idiot and wipe the floor with any one defending this fraud.

      • Yes. NASA’s proof they went to the moon: “Because it is easier to go to the moon than fake going to the moon…” So one wonders why all these moon films, instead of just going to the moon and shooting it on the moon, which is so much easier, according to NASA, they always fake it, and their fakes look very believable also?

      • Jim says:

        Musk WILL GO

        Bank on it! The stainless steel hul of his ship along with other features will solve this problem. I see him going for a polar orbit and escaping van Allen that way.

        • Yes. Musk’s stainless steel grain silo like rockets. Unfortunately they just explode on the ground most times… Maybe after a thousand lifetimes Musk will realize it is not possible to go to the moon with a stainless steel cylinder full of explosives.

  2. Curious says:

    I know this thread is old, but I am wondering about your response to Japan’s satellite fly by of the moon which documented photos of the NASA landings.

    I think the confusion with NASA’s comments about not launching additional landings in recent years is when the say the cannot, they are speaking in financial terms.

    • NASA currently say they can send men to the moon, not for financial reasons, but because it is currently technically impossible to send men to the moon. There are many reasons, the one NASA mostly quotes is that there is very dangerous radiation in the Van Allen Radiation Belts that surround earth and which also exists in space, that, without shielding, would kill the astronauts. So at this time they have no technology to provide radiation shielding that is light enough to be put on a spacecraft that could still be lifted up fast enough to reach escape velocity. They could do it with a foot of lead or five feet of water, but that is too heavy to lift out of the earth’s atmosphere.

      So it is not a financial thing, it is that we do not have the technology to take men to the moon yet. So if we do not have it now, we did not have it in the 1960’s either.

      As far as the ‘photos’ of NASA’s moon landings, it is ridiculous. A few scratches and dark pixals, that’s all. Look at google earth, photos taken from satellites, and compare that with the quality of NASA’s moon landing sites photo. It is crazy. A few dark pixals, that’s all…

      NASA have effectively admitted they did not send men to the moon and they are gradually letting that information out. If we went to the moon many times back in the 1960’s then we would not have stopped going to the moon and by now moon travel would be relatively routine, at least for scientific purposes, and probably for mining, etc. But now we can not go beyond low earth orbit. They could never go beyond low earth orbit. It was all faked…

  3. Whatever says:

    Are you really saying that because we CHOOSE not to do something today that it means it was impossible to do in the past, what happens if we don’t do something we did yesterday, does that mean we didn’t do it yesterday.

    • NASA quite openly admits that it is impossible for them to send men to the moon at the present time. The technology is not yet available to send people anywhere further than earth orbit. They can send people up about 100 or 200 miles, no further than that.

      There are many problems. One big problem is that the earth is surrounded by belts of strong radiation which people can not pass through without heavy radiation shielding. And there is no technology at present to provide that radiation shielding which is light enough to be lifted off the earth by the rockets they have…

      So we have never been to the moon. The Apollo moon missions were faked. Man has never walked on the moon.

      Sorry. It was only a TV show…

      Chant Hare Krishna and be happy!

      Madhudvisa dasa

  4. Vince says:

    Has anyone ever seen the Apollo 11 press conference after their return? They looked like three guys full of shame that they had to lie to the whole world.

    In the video above on this page there is a short secment from that press conference starting at apprx min. 29:00. Look at their faces and tell me if it looks like three men having performed the biggest mission or step in mankind history returning from a foreign planet? Just think about it.

  5. Nicole Poirier says:

    It’s pure nonsense! NASA just wanted to be the “1st” to say they landed on the moon beating the Russians. My English professor in 1974 had publicly announced that he never believed the moon landing. People thought he was nuts but I believed him. All the moon needs is a bunch of lunatic terrorists like we have on this planet. God forbid! Krishna protect the “Moon people”!

  6. John says:

    Look at press conference at around from 32 minutes into the video. Do they look like three guys who had just been part of the biggest mission in modern history landing on the moon?

    IMO they look like three kids who know they have been naughty and are just waiting for the parents to find out what they have been up to.

  7. Ranger says:

    That’s is… doubt? You provide NO scientific or physical PROOF that they DIDN’T go to the Moon… just disbelief? LOL! Quit clogging up the internet with your garbage idiot. Provide PROOF or STFU!

    • Hare Krishna Ranger

      The proof that we did not send men to the moon in the 60’s is that WE CAN NOT SEND MEN TO THE MOON TODAY!

      So how stupid can you be to believe that we could successfully send men to the moon and back again 6 times very easily on a 500,000 mile trip and since then for more than fifty years no man has ever left the low earth orbit. No man has ever gone higher than 300 miles in the past 50 years?

      Why? Why can’t we go any further than 300 miles up now if we could go 250,000 miles up to the moon and back in the 60’s. Why? Obviously because they faked the moon missions in the 60’s.

      If you can not see this then there is no brain between your ears…

      • Nicole Poirier says:

        Hare Krishna Madhudvisa dasa,

        Very Intelligent Logical response! Hare Bol! Let us forget trying to reach the moon and focus on reaching a happy situation in the next life!

  8. Joseph says:

    Dear __________,

    Please shepherd these videos to the Internet, and, in effect, the public domain. I wish to remain anonymous, and I trust you will take care in my request. I would be very grateful. I am asking other parties for the same favor. I hope someone obliges me. These videos are significant, I humbly say.

    In these videos I absolutely and unequivocally prove that the Apollo moon landing footage is manufactured on Earth through extensive analysis of falling objects and sand seen in the TV footage. However the complete analysis is far more involved than just that. I believe you will be impressed.

    The Presentation videos are YouTube and Vimeo upload-ready. I would also appreciate if you would post all of the video links provided below for download by anyone.

    I thank you.

    Presentation Videos:

    Make_Believe___part_one___MAIN_____.mp4 5.94 GB
    https://mega.co.nz/#!0ghi0T7T!eqLYOfkdF1MMoLjEE8FyO_IMVOFsiOLwW3wFJlD9MWU

    Make_Believe___part_two___APPENDIX_.mp4 1.88 GB
    https://mega.co.nz/#!U1QmGZ6D!zzpsHqGwsPTG1b1TcCqNAFUcKyjQHWXy0PvBEWc8JXQ

    TVcamera footage edits:

    A11_tvcamera_raw_and_retime_f4v.zip 641.7 MB
    https://mega.co.nz/#!lkByyZ7b!IUl6FxRHfTORfON50-k0yDgc8aMixcl_oq0rlcjKRyU

    A12_tvcamera_raw_and_retime_f4v.zip 160.1 MB
    https://mega.co.nz/#!A8BRmIAA!K4Zc0CURPahJvWvDbSYGteTHoqB4w9HsoC3XhFLLsNY

    A14_tvcamera_raw_and_retime_f4v.zip 1.93 GB
    https://mega.co.nz/#!4x4yjSzJ!KDH7XH36n7ntDcaRf4RBe8IUzdHFtbojnz2lFAEpvyQ

    A15_tvcamera_raw_and_retime_f4v.zip 2.89 GB
    https://mega.co.nz/#!xxwymArR!E_V83ZM2j4pEiIRYAvwqyt5Rt9WWVLUHGQnNz68BdtA

    A16_tvcamera_raw_and_retime_f4v.zip 3.97 GB
    https://mega.co.nz/#!E8w01BaC!uQdNiOIXhZ8ngSAA_PtTwaAfcAvILzHjef_REy5FFAc

    A17_tvcamera_raw_and_retime_f4v.zip 4.10 GB
    https://mega.co.nz/#!5wBSWIQY!kZGTHi00zNqf-QZ3uYmJlC06G-rry_aBiFApv9kkiU0

    • Hi Joseph

      Thank you very much for providing these moon mission video download links.

      I have uploaded the two video to:

      http://krishnatube.com/video/1502/Make-Believe-NASA-Moon-Missions-Part-1

      http://krishnatube.com/video/1505/Make-Believe-NASA-Moon-Missions-Part-2

      It is a lot of work and very well done but a great pity the audio is almost impossible to understand. That will make it very difficult for most people to watch. I think it would be worth redoing with good quality audio. Then many more people will watch it.

      I have also linked these videos from this Krishna.org article:

      https://krishna.org/proof-of-faked-apollo-footage/

      Chant Hare Krishna and be happy!

      Madhudvisa dasa

      • Joseph says:

        Thank you!

        I know the audio is a challenge, but it was a compromise between my maintaining anonymity, and making it as clear as possible. There is only a voice track, so perhaps someone will caption it or redo the VO. I have released these to the world. They are no longer mine. They are everyone’s.

        Namaste.

        • Hare Krishna Joseph

          Yes. It is a truly great contribution. Very impressive and in depth analysis. I encourage everyone to watch it and I will also watch it completely when I get the time. Serious people will watch it and take the time to understand the voice even though it is a bit of a challenge.

          Could you write a summary in a few paragraphs of the basic points you investigated and what were your conclusions on these points?

          Chant Hare Krishna and be happy!

          Madhudvisa dasa

          • Joseph says:

            As stated above, I measured the speed of falling objects and of falling sand in the Apollo television footage, referencing the number of footage frames they traveled to/from their apex, and referencing the astronauts for height measurement. There are dozens of instances where the measurements are significantly inconsistent with lunar gravity. This is not possible were they really on the moon.

            And, based on my evaluation for how the footage was captured and altered into slow-motion, the measurements are precisely consistent with Earth gravity.

            My measurements are reproduce-able by independent scientists, and I give clear reference to the source footage so that this can be done with the least amount of effort.

            I would be incredible pleased if a high school student or a team of high school students – or younger – took the effort to do this. That is how accessible and of basic science this analysis is.

            That is about 5% of the video presentation. There are quite a few cool things to learn in it.

            The full presentation I expect will make absolutely clear to any reasonable person that the moon walks were staged.

  9. Subalaji says:

    First of all this Space travells as à y hypes is à joke by the fact we are alteady leaving in Universums space and performing therefor space travells while we are on this planet or any planet in this auniverse in chargé by the 4 heade Lord Brahma WHO also are à Pure Devotee by Association of Lord Caitanya at Lord Gaurangas ” birth”!

  10. Craig says:

    And the reason why we haven’t returned is the cost, the 60s we had Cold War money, a dead president’s dream and the need to beat the Soviets (Search Soviet manned lunar program).

    The logic about returning is that it’s argued there’s no put to it (because we would have to build a new heavy lift rocket, new spacesuits, new launch vehicles…) unless we build a base and it much harder to live somewhere than it is to just visit, the International Space Station has receive regular supply visits to keep it operational.

    With airplanes it was about learning how to glide (the aerodynamics of lift), and developing more powerful internal combustion engines(circa 1904). With rockets they go straight up and burn fuel, and a lot of it and there isn’t really a more efficient way to do it. Different fuels have been developed but there hasn’t been a jet engine type revolution to the rocket business.

  11. Craig says:

    Those were two failures out of about one-hundred-thirty. Space travel is a dangerous business, a lot things can go wrong when you have that much rocket fuel, traveling at that speed while being required to keep a crew alive, they don’t call it rocket science for no reason. In the Apollo program we lost three men just during a test exercise (latter dubbed Apollo 1). And we actually (or if you want “claimed”) went to the moon nine times(8,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17), only walked on it six times(11,12,14,15,16,17).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Back to Top ↑