NASA Admits they Did Not go to the Moon
NASA is the first to admit that they are many unresolved issues for future manned flights to the Moon. Our scientific understanding of may things has progressed since the 60’s when the Apollo Lunar Landings were supposed to have taken place. And one area where we now have significant data which we did not have in the 60’s is in regard to the levels of radiation that exists in space and the radiation belts that surround earth. Now it is scientific fact, beyond any question of a doubt, that if someone is traveling in space he is going to be exposed to very high levels of radiation compared with the situation here on earth. This has been measured for example in the International Space Station which is orbiting the earth only about two hundred miles away. But even at this relatively low altitude the levels of radiation on the ISS are considerably elevated above those here on earth.
Of course the position of the ISS is far below the beginning of the Van Allen Belts, which are very highly charged belts of radiation surrounding the entire earth. Today we have many satelites in the Van Allen Belts and accurate measurements of the extent and levels of radiation a space craft would have to pass through to leave earth orbit are known scientific facts.
Although the Van Allen Belts contain extremely high levels of radiation, even in space the level of radiation is very high, compared with here on earth, due to cosmic rays, so even if one could pass through the Van Allen Belts still simply traveling in space without proper shielding from the radiation would be very detrimental to human health.
The biggest challenge, therefor, that NASA and other organizations trying to commence manned space flight is how to shield the astronauts from the lethal radiation, not only during their passing through the Van Allen Belts, which may be only for a period of 1-2 hours, but also they need to be protected from the cosmic radiation and random radiation spikes as a result of sunspots, etc.
Because now the levels of radiation are known in the Van Allen Belts and also we are reasonably sure about the levels of the cosmic radiation one may experience traveling through space the amount of shielding that would be required to protect astronauts from this radiation can be calculated. And it turns out that the best way would be to surround the spaceship with a layer of water as water is an effective shield for radiation. But the problem is the calculations reveal that around two meters of water (more than 6 feet) would be required to surround the spaceship in every direction. But such a large amount of water would be extremely heavy and currently no one can imagine any propulsion system that would be capable of lifting such a huge quantity of water.
Nowadays the levels of radiation in the Van Allen Belts, as I said already, are known, and the level of shielding required for humans to pass through the Van Allen Belts is also known. These are now scientific facts. And NASA also accepts that if they are going to send men out of earth orbit then they are going to have to find some solution to the radiation problem.
There has been a long string of experiments trying to send animals through the Van Allen Belts and return them to earth. But so far, except for a tortoise and maybe some other reptiles, all the animals have died. Certainly all the mammals have died due to exposure to the radiation.
So NASA are now “between a rock and a hard place.” On one hand they are trying to defend the lie that in the 60’s they had six glorious Apollo missions where they send men safely to the moon and returned them home. Of course to do this the Apollo astronauts would have had to pass through the Van Allen Radiation belts twice. But according to our current scientific understanding of the Van Allen Belts this is not possible. Every mammal who has passed through the Van Allen Belts has died. And on the other hand NASA is openly stating that to make manned space flight possible in the future they have to find some way to solve the radiation problem.
The proof is there in NASA’s own Apollo data. The astronauts spacesuits had radiation meters sewn into them. And the readings on these radiation meters show that for a complete Apollo Moon landing mission the astronauts were only exposed to something like .8 rem of radiation. Even if they had just gone to the International Space Station, which is way below the Van Allen belts, they would have experienced more radiation than this. So NASA’s own Apollo data proves scientifically without any question of doubt that the astronauts never left earth orbit. They could not have left earth orbit as they had no radiation shielding and would have been killed simply passing through the Van Allen Belts, even if somehow they got through, they would have been killed by the cosmic radiation.
And these days every thoughtful scientist knows this to be a fact. That NASA’s Apollo missions never went to the moon. And NASA themselves are announcing that “We Never Went to the Moon” when they tell us that “we will not be able to embark on future manned space flight until we can solve the radiation problem.” So the radiation problem was not solved in the 60’s and therefore space flight was not possible in the 60’s. NASA is admitting this openly.
Please listen to the very interesting Truth News Australia radio show interview with Damon Crowe who is a scientist discussing very scientifically the challenge of overcoming the problem of radiation on manned space flights. He proves conclusively that without adequate radiation shielding manned spaceflight is not possible, and he establishes that the Apollo missions did not provide any significant radiation shielding thus proving conclusively that they never left earth orbit.
Leave a Reply
9 Responses to NASA Admits they Did Not go to the Moon
About the Author
Madhudvisa dasa My first contact with a Hare Krishna was a most merciful Mataji in Oxford Street, London who sold me a "Higher Taste" cook book in 1984 while I was on holidays there. I started seriously reading Srila Prabhupada's books in Australia 1985 and by 1986 Srila Prabhupada had convinced me "Krishna is the Supreme Personality of Godhead" and "we should surrender to Krishna." I joined the Hare Krishnas in Perth, Western Australia in 1986. Since then I have been chanting Hare Krishna, Hare Krishna, Krishna Krishna, Hare Hare/ Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Hare, reading and distributing Srila Prabhupada's books and preaching as much as I can. That's my life and full-time occupation now really. I like it more than anything I've ever experienced before. Srila Prabhupada's books are so amazing... Even after reading them all many times they're still fresh and new. They are truly transcendental! That's it really. Now I'm just hankering to once again see the world chant Hare Krishna, dance and feast and float away in the ecstasy of Lord Caitanya's Sankirtana movement as it did in Srila Prabhupada's physical presence. Let the whole world drown in the ecstatic flood of love of Krishna!
What utter ill-informed nonsense.
The Van Allen belts would have been aproblem if the Apollo craft hadflownthrough them at the Equator,but they didn’t and instead went through the thinnest section, with the vehicle constantly rotating as it travelled, thus getting around the problem.
The radiation that you are mistaking for the Van Allen belts – the real problematic radiation – would happen on long flights – it took a mere 3 days to get to the Moon, but going to Mars with the publicly acknowledged methods we currently have – would take 9 monthsor more, depending on the flight path, and THAT iswhat needs to be ‘solved’ – and absolutely not the VA belts.
Apollo was tracked worldwide there & back and to fake this at the time was simply NOT POSSIBLE – weare talking keeping some 200,000 – 500,000 people silent. Pleaase, guys, be serious. There is also a wonderful presentation made by a cinematic ‘special effects’ expert who points out that we simply did not have the video technology to fake this given Apollo 11 was all at 12fps – NTSC frame rates did not happen until later. To fake this would have taken thousands & thousands of feet of film, any frame of which couldget a scratch or similar that would literally give the game away.
Please see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_loUDS4c3Cs
I love a good conspiracy theory – but the key word there is ‘good’. All the ‘Moon landings were faked’ claims are not good conspiracy theories, they are lunatic fringe.
Yes Neil. It would be so much easier for NASA to go to the moon, than the impossible to fake using 1970’s technology fuzzy black and white television picture they showed us of the astronauts on the moon? Did you ever see “2001: A Space Odyssey,” filmed in 1967, long before it was impossible, according to you, for NASA to fake fuzzy television footage? How did they make that film with 1967 technology? If it was impossible to fake space then?
What planet do you live on? What sort of fools do you think could possibly believe the rubbish you write.
And how can you explain, it was so easy for NASA to send multiple successful Apollo missions to the moon and bring the astronauts home safely, but since then NOT A SINGLE PERSON HAS EVEN LEFT LOW-EARTH ORBIT. What to speak of going to the moon? Today we can not even send people out of low earth orbit??? NASA have no idea today, how we could send men to the moon and bring them home safely? There are so many problems they have not yet resolved…
Then why have NASA’s engineers and scientists repeatedly made comments “we RECENTLY developed Space Suits that can handle the harsh conditions on the Moon ” ? RECENTLY ! slip of the tongue ? That statement alone is admitting we never went ! Another comment was” we lost the technology we used to get us to the Moon”? Come on ! “All the Moon Rocks were stolen including the safe they were in ” at NASA Headquarters ? One of the most secure places on Earth and someone took a 5,000 pound safe with the rocks inside and nobody saw a thing ?
What would the rotating do to diminish the amount of radiation ? That doesn’t seem logical ? I am not a rocket scientist but radiation is radiation and I have never heard rotation will diminish or eliminate exposure to it ?
One other thing ! I was 7 years old and I remember the “Moon Landing ” I also remember how hard it was to get reception ! If a neighbor used a vacuum or a blender or many other appliances , there went your picture ! It didnt take much , a plane flying over etc and somehow they televised with a perfectly clear picture from the Moon ? But none of that matters because the comment about the space suits from a NASA engineer said it all ,
Just stop. The ludicrously low odds of success were met. 6 times! Anyone that believes THAT needs some serious assistance with their cognitive reasoning.
They say we do not have the materials available to leave the earth’s atmosphere. If that is the case what did we build the rocket that flew the rover to Mars and land and take pictures is this being faked?
They do not say that. They say we have not overcome the problems in manned flights beyond low-earth orbit. NASA says that. That currently they are unable to send people out of low earth orbit. Which means they could not have sent people out of low earth orbit to the moon in the 1960s. Means NASA’s men on the moon story is a lie, fake.
I prove the hammer and feather test was impossible in the Unified field theory I unlocked after solving the double slit experiment. Two objects of the different weights will fall at the same speed in the same gravity BUT they must be the same density. NASA lied. I have tried for months to have it peer reviewed but no journal will touch it. I wonder why? You can read, share, discuss it freely because it’s available on open access CC copyright at https://doubleslitsolution.weebly.com