Krishna.org Website Statistics

Comments Posted By Kyle

Displaying 1 To 18 Of 18 Comments

Did man really walk on the Moon ???

This has already been done multiple times, by multiple agencies, from multiple countries over the past 5 years or so. Look it up and stop being ignorant. I have provided links in previous comments already.

» Posted By Kyle On January 24, 2013 @ 1:06 am

Here you are: http://www.universetoday.com/94035/best-views-yet-of-historic-apollo-landing-sites/

By the way if you want to understand why telescopes cannot directly image the landing sites you may want to do some independent research on subjects like focal points and angular sizes. It isn’t difficult to understand when you actually read up on the subject.

» Posted By Kyle On March 8, 2012 @ 4:54 pm

What I think is hilarious is the person saying others can’t spell or use proper grammar has probably the worst grammar I’ve read so far on this page. Good job in teaching us all a lesson in irony.

» Posted By Kyle On December 26, 2011 @ 5:01 pm

I couldn’t find the original article that detailed Japan repurposing one of their Earth climate monitoring satellites as a Moon orbiter. The Grail probe does essentially the same thing however. Instead of using booster rockets and thrust to reach the Moon, they are using orbital mechanics such as Lagrange Points to get there. The original point made was that it takes an “impossible amount of energy to reach the Moon” which is just patently false if you understood the first thing about demonstrable and actually very simple physics.

» Posted By Kyle On December 5, 2011 @ 9:50 pm

Uhh… Dude:

http://www.google.com/moon/
http://www.google.com/mars/

There you go!

» Posted By Kyle On December 5, 2011 @ 3:24 pm

http://news.discovery.com/space/moon-grail-mission-nasa-110822.html

» Posted By Kyle On December 3, 2011 @ 8:37 pm

http://news.discovery.com/space/moon-grail-mission-nasa-110822.html

» Posted By Kyle On December 3, 2011 @ 8:37 pm

“You saw the huge power needed to get a rocket up into space and the ‘returning’ astronauts splashing down in the sea and yet they calmly landed on the moon, unhitched their equipment, played around for a few hours, sent back pictures and sound to the earth, went back to their rocket and took off without a hitch.”

Japan proved that you can actually get to the Moon with the equivalent power of your everyday car. Orbital mechanics can and have been used to get us to the farthest reaches of our own solar system and beyond. The Apollo missions sped the process up a bit with some oversized boosters, but it was definitely not beyond our capabilities at the time.

“Just study the pictures. Don’t they look phoney? Speed up their moon walking and you can see their actions are slowed down film just like an old B movie.”

We can stick you in some weights and scuba gear at the bottom of the ocean and speed you up and you can tell me when we speed the footage up that you were faking it… I’m really not sure what you are talking about.

There’s just far too much evidence that we landed on the Moon and the “evidence” for a hoax is easily reputed with sound scientific explanation. If you want to live in your conspiratorial world, feel free.

» Posted By Kyle On November 6, 2011 @ 5:55 am

You sound like a real expert on rocketry Geoff. Anymore brilliant insight on why you think something is a hoax because you completely lack any common knowledge on the subject?

» Posted By Kyle On September 29, 2011 @ 2:01 pm

@Don

There is very little point in sending men to the Moon at this point when unmanned craft can do the job of scientific discovery. The only point in sending man to the Moon today would be to establish (semi) permanent laboratories and bases but NASA lacks the funding to do that these days. They barely have money to put craft in orbit around the Earth today. So it is not a question about the will to do it or the technology to do it. It is a lack of funding to do it because we waste our money on frivolities.

» Posted By kyle On September 7, 2011 @ 5:06 pm

Hubble doesn’t work like that. An object the size of the Moon lander is far too small on object even for Hubble to resolve. But the Indians, coincidentally enough, viewed the Apollo landing sites with their Chandrayaan-1 Lunar orbiter. Do some research before you make yourself out to be a fool.

» Posted By Kyle On August 21, 2011 @ 6:20 pm

That is actually incorrect Madhudvisa. Any HAM Radio enthusiast can build a large dish and pick up telemetry from a number of probes far beyond Earth’s orbit. Please educate yourself before you go spouting off nonsense about things you do not understand.

» Posted By kyle On July 22, 2011 @ 2:04 pm

@atombomb

The reason mirrors were placed on the Moon was for two reasons:

1) Precision
2) The distance between the Moon and the Earth is not static. Every moment the Moon is very slowly creeping away from the Earth. The Sun will have long burned up and possibly even swallowed the Earth before the Moon leaves orbit though. In fact it was these mirrors that confirmed this, nailed down the rate of orbital decay, and gave us a precise measurement of mass for the Moon.

THAT is why NASA placed mirrors on the Moon. I hope that answers your question.

» Posted By Kyle On January 18, 2011 @ 12:16 am

Because the truth already surfaced about 40 years ago. We landed on the Moon and mankind walked on it’s surface.

I don’t know what you’re talking about saying NASA “refused” to photograph the Apollo Landing sites… because they did!

http://www.popsci.com/military-aviation-amp-space/article/2009-07/lunar-probe-goes-camera-crazy-apollo-landing-sites

» Posted By Kyle On December 7, 2010 @ 7:46 pm

1- Of COURSE they had a rehearsal! Do you think you could just wake up one day and know how to wear a space suit??? We’re not talking about putting on a pair of pants and sweater. It takes considerable training to learn to properly function in a spacesuit.

2- I’ll show you a piece of toast with the Virgin Mary on it too. They say if you look hard enough for something you’ll see it. I see the C on the rock but the C on the ground is a real big stretch. I don’t see it at all tbh. The author is nothing more than a modern day thaumateurgist, staring at bones and divining bad science the whole way through.

3- The astronauts themselves have all said they learned to take very short hops that on Earth wouldn’t have even gotten their feet off the ground. They could have taken larger leaps but to fall on their backs in those bulky suits would’ve been disasterous. Also the suits they wore weighed 170lbs so they were significantly weighed down.

4- This is typical conspiracy theorist garbage and doesn’t even deserve a reply except to counter my parents, grandparents, and various other family members are all dead. There must be a conspiracy to kill people in my family, right? Right?? Riiiiight…

5- The shots were taken in daylight. Just because the sky is black due to lack of atmosphere doesn’t mean you should expect nighttime like lighting.

6- What “astronomer” was blinded? Provide facts, not lies. Astronauts have been spending extended periods of time in space since Skylab in the 70s with very little adverse effects aside from muscle and bone atrophy from zero-g. They do receive more radiation, but not a life threatening amount. As for the camera, same deal. If shielded properly from radiation there will be no melting of lenses or electronics. Anyone who has been to an Xray lab and seen the technician stand behind the wall has witnessed how humans protect themselves from radiation.

7- See 5

8- I don’t know anything about rocks from Alaska but I think one of the thousands of geoligists who have studied the Moon rocks would’ve noticed that they came from Earth instead. They haven’t because there is empirical and incontrovertible evidence that the rocks came from the Moon.

9- Neil Armstrong is not a hoax. I met the guy at an Purdue engineering alumnist convention. He’s real. And so are the Moon landings.

I applaud your efforts to think for yourself and do research but realize that the conspiracy theorists have books to sell to you. They aren’t scientists. They aren’t a primary source of information on the Moon landings. No one involved in the landings blew a single whistle. It would take incredible amount of fortune to keep everyone quiet. In otherwords it would take a lot more effort to make this hoax work than just to land on the stupid Moon. It’s not as impossible as you think to land on the Moon. You just have to know something about physics which is something the conspiracy folks obviously know very little about.

» Posted By Kyle On November 20, 2010 @ 4:12 pm

One word: Gyroscopes. We’ve had autopilot machines since the 1930s. They don’t require powerful computers to operate or computers at all if you have a good pilot. Please educate yourself instead of taking an uneducated conspiracy theorists word for it.

I know its likely too much to ask of you but think logically about this: It would’ve taken much more effort to create a hoax that tens of thousands of scientists from many nationalities conspired together on. Even the US’ enemy at the time, Soviet Russia acknowledged the achievement.

I understand that someone with little to no scientific background might see landing on the moon as being impossible but it’s not. A simple 100 level college course in physics could elucidate you to this fact.

» Posted By Kyle On November 1, 2010 @ 6:25 pm

Chris,

It is much easier to maintain normal air pressure in a capsule in space than it is to deal with the intense pressure of the deep sea. Think of a simple scientific experiment to prove this:

Put a can of soda (the capsule) in a vacuum chamber… Does anything happen? No of course not. The can maintains it’s structural integrity because all opposing forces exist within the can and the vacuum is a… well vacuum. It has no force on the pressurized capsule. Open the can and it will explode obviously as the gasses contained within rush to meet equilibrium.

Now put the same can in a pressure chamber and crank that baby up to equivalent pressures 1km under the ocean. That same can will slowly begin to be crushed. This is because the outside pressures are acting upon the structure of the can.

This is why it is easier to go to the Moon than it is to go to the bottom of the Ocean.

Next time, think like a scientist instead of a conspiracy theorist. The truth is much more interesting than some idiotic crackpot claims that a three year old could debunk.

» Posted By Kyle On July 6, 2010 @ 5:52 pm

Alright you hippies. Put down your bongs and read this: http://www.space.com/news/090717-lro-apollo11-images.html

So now that we have actual pictures from a JAXA (Japanese) Lunar Orbiter what is your excuse now? America is the devil and they want you to believe they went to the moon so you will eat more of their delicious cheeseburgers? You conspiracy theorists show your scientific ignorance when you make up these ridiculous claims. My favorite was “Why don’t they just use the Hubble to take pictures of the lander?”

» Posted By Kyle On July 6, 2010 @ 5:47 pm

«« Back To Stats Page

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

6 Responses to Krishna.org Website Statistics

  1. Govind says:

    Hare krishna Prabhuji.,Dandvat Pranaam
    May i know about the author of the book”Srila Prabhupada Lilamrita As It Is” named mukund das prabhu.Had he any personal association with Srila Prabhupada.

    • This book is a compilation of direct quotes from Srila Prabhupada speaking about his own life. The author is Srila Prabhuapda, all Mukunda did was compile the quotes and he did a good job of it. He wrote a bit of rubbish on the last 2 pages but apart from that he did not write a single word in the book. It is a collection of Prabhupada quotes and the author of this book is Srila Prabhuapda.

  2. Vamshi says:

    Prabhu Madhudvisa Dasa.Is Jagannath Krishna himself or is just an expansion of Krishna like Vishnu,Rama etc.In Iskcon lectures I heard that Jagannath is Krishna himself,they have proved this by saying a story from Skanda purana.Is this true or Iskcon lectures are just bogus?I found no video Prabhupad talking aboyt Lord Jagannath.Oh Prabhu kindly answer my doubts.Hare Krishna

    • Yes. Lord Jagannatah is Krishna Himself. It is Jagannatha [Krishna] Balarama and Krishna’s sister Subhadra.

      So Jagannatha is deity form of Krishna. He is representation of Krishna with His brother Balarama and sister Subhadra,

      It is deity manifestation of Krishna, Balarama and Lady Subhadra,

  3. tanu says:

    Jai Govind

    I request you clear my doubts.I understand the complexities of life processes,cellular mechanisms and other natural phenomenon cannot be explained solely by reasoning and scientific theories as somewhere or other our knowledge is limited.I am a science student nd nature lover.After reading the article posted by you regarding the concept of the origin of life,a question arisen in my mind that krishna is all powerful,then, why he designed this universe in this complicated way?,why life originated? why he made all that dna etc matter space?what is his true nature? why are we given these bodies these reasoning abilities?why krishna waited for billions of years and made us take birth here?why prakrati and purush got seperated? who were those dinosaurs etc for souls are eternal were those dinosaurs primitive and other organisms we only? are there any planet lest earth having life?why will happen atlast for we are ultimately destined to reach our eternal govind? why doesn’t he appears now and clear all these doubts for one thing is sure that if even he messages in some ways we will submit to him?why krishna is so naughty why has he made everything complicated?I know these are childlish questions but still worthy to be answered…..

    I am a krishana devotee.I feel as if there is pure love for him deep in my heart.But at the same time I do believe in science.Sometimes i find myself stuck in between science emotions belief and devotion.I want to understand my Govind,I want to understand myself.

    I request my friends to please give answer to these questions.I hope i will get atleast answers of a few questions as i found this site quite appealing.

    thankyou!
    Radhe krishna

    • Hare Krishna Jai Govind

      To clear your doubts you have to become Krishna conscious. Because unless you become Krishna conscious you will not be able to understand what Krishna consciousness is and you will remain continually bewildered.

      All these questions are irrelevant. You seem to accept that Govinda exists, that He is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Now you have to just surrender to the idea that you are His servant. And then you need to find out practically how you can engage in the service of Krishna. And to find out how to do this you need to read Srila Prabhupada’s books. And in the process of becoming Krishna conscious all your other questions will automatically be answered.

      The scientists can not understand anything. They only have very fragmental information about everything they study. The information we can gather through our material senses is very limited. There are so many things we can not perceive through our material senses. So they can not understand what they can not perceive.

      So instead of just speculating all these questions and being bewildered like this it is better to just admit that in our conditioned state with our very limited mind and our material senses we can not hope to understand Krishna or even this material world which is created ultimately by Krishna.

      The way to understand these things is to become Krishna conscious. We can not understand without becoming Krishna conscious.

      So you have to learn how to become Krishna conscious… That is the answer to all your questions. And Krishna consciousness is a science and that science is very elaborately presented in the books of His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada.

      Chant Hare Krishna and be happy!

      Madhudvisa dasa

Back to Top ↑